SCOTUS Takes Another Case!

Mexico is suing a US company for facilitating crime. Yep, you read that correctly. That case, known as Smith & Wesson v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, will now be heard by the Supreme Court.
The suit alleges that Smith & Wesson, in the otherwise lawful operation of their business, facilitates crime by Mexican drug cartels. Since the passage of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) in 2005, firearms manufacturers have been shielded from responsibility when someone illegally uses their products. Can the PLCAA really be undone by a foreign country?
To help grapple with that question and the other implications of the case, attorney Kostas Moros joins CRPA TV host Kevin Small. Along with the Vanderstok case that was argued on Tuesday, and possibly others (Snope, for instance), this case provides an opportunity for the Court to clarify the application of the Bruen standard going forward.
WATCH CRPA TV NOW!
The proper application of Bruen is CRITICAL to so many cases across the country. Too often courts are simply disregarding the new standard entirely. In Snope, the Second Amendment part of the challenge was dispensed with by the argument that an AR-15 isn’t even a firearm. How long do we really want to put up with that “logic”?
We NEED YOUR HELP to keep the pressure on the Supreme Court to CLARIFY BRUEN!