State Blocking CRPA Challenge To 11% Excise Tax
The State of California is tossing up roadblocks in the case of Jaymes v. Maduros, CRPA’s challenge to the wildly unconstitutional 11% excise tax imposed this past year. Seemingly at a loss to defend the tax itself as anything more than punitive, the Department of Justice resorted to invoking administrative parlor tricks to delay the case.
The new tax was proposed many times in the legislature but finally passed in the form of a bill known as SB 28 in the wake of, and largely in response to, the announcement of the Bruen decision. Now the case stands as a test of just how far the government can push its gun control agenda. Needless to say, the outcome of this case is CRUCIAL.
To help unwind the various legal issues at play, CRPA TV host recently welcomed in attorney Josh Dale, a member of the legal team pursuing the lawsuit. In this informative interview, Mr. Dale lays out the state of play and addresses some of the numerous questions that viewers have been asking. WATCH CRPA TV NOW!
The 11% excise tax embodies the post-Bruen strategy of gun control advocates: make Second Amendment rights so costly and difficult to exercise as possible in the hope that we all will just give up. But that will NEVER HAPPEN!