UPDATE! SUPPORT AB 2510

UPDATE: AB 2510 has passed out of the Assembly with a 74-0 vote. This bill, which is supported by the CRPA, NRA, GOC and law enforcement groups is a positive step towards reaching CCW licensure uniformity throughout California!

CRPA Continues To Stand In Support Of

Local Law Enforcement And AB 2510
On Wednesday of last week, Assembly Bill 2510 (Linder R – Corona) was passed out of the Appropriations Committee with support from both sides of the aisle.

AB 2510 will allow local law enforcement authorities to issue CCW identification cards to citizens in lieu of the current paper document provided by the California Department of Justice. In addition to the information already required on the card by the CA DOJ,the new CCW identification cards would become more standardized across the state. Cards will also require a current photograph of the CCW license holder, such as the photo that can be found on your driver’s license.

To ensure a smooth transition to this program, officers will be trained to recognize these new identification cards and the CA DOJ will create a database containing examples of the new identification cards, issued by each county, to prevent confusion. Counties will have an opportunity to choose whether to participate in this new program.

A critical aspect of this bill is that counties can opt in and are not mandated to issue these identification cards. By codifying this program as an alternative option to the one already in place, elected officials are creating an opportunity for better cooperation and communication between local law enforcement and the CA DOJ.

CRPA has and will continue to stand with law enforcement in support of AB 2510. AB 2510 will be coming to a vote this Thursday on the Assembly floor, and we strongly encourage you to contact your State Assembly Member to encourage their support for this legislation. To find your local representative, click here. Also, to read CRPA’s official letter in support of AB 2510, click here.

CRPA needs your help to continue these battles in Sacramento and through out California on behalf of law enforcement and gun owners. With your donation, we will be able to continue to preserve our Second Amendment rights for generations to come.

Donate To Help Support CRPA’s Lobbying Efforts

 

Thank you!

2 responses to “UPDATE! SUPPORT AB 2510

  1. Per Firearms Policy Coalition:

    AB 2510 is authored by Assemblyman Eric Linder, a Republican (in name only?) who just last year voted to ban Second Amendment rights and outlaw carry on school grounds by law-abiding gun owners and handgun carry (“CCW”) licensees.

    (Thanks to Assemblyman Linder and his anti-gun colleagues, FPC, 3 other civil rights groups, and 11 individuals were forced to file a federal civil rights lawsuit over that bill.)

    According to Linder, AB 2510 is “needed” to create a “uniform” CCW license in California. But, as you’ll quickly see below, that’s just a bunch of made-up BS from a politician you can’t trust. (Don’t take our word for it—read the bill and see for yourself.)

    Since AB 2510 was introduced, on many occasions, we’ve tried to help Linder fix AB 2510. He’s so far refused for political reasons—see below, where we show that he’s been endorsed in the 2016 election by the bill’s sponsor, the generally-anti-gun California State Sheriffs’ Association.

    FACTS AND FALSEHOODS

    FACT: California law already requires a uniform carry license: “Applications for licenses, applications for amendments to licenses, amendments to licenses, and [CCW] licenses under this article shall be uniform throughout the state, upon forms to be prescribed by the Attorney General.” (Cal. Penal Code. section 26175(a)(1).)

    FACT: According to Eric Linder’s own [amusingly-named] AB 2510 “fact sheet“, some (many?) sheriffs are already breaking the law and giving out their own licenses — their very acts gutting California’s existing uniform license.

    FACT: The bill’s sponsor, California State Sheriffs’ Association, opposed the Peruta CCW decision and supports “may-issue” gun control regulations, supported the dangerous “Gun Violence Restraining Order” bill AB 1014, supports so-called “universal background checks” and waiting periods for all firearm purchases, and endorses Assemblyman Eric Linder. (Shocked? Neither are we.)

    FACT: California State Sheriffs’ Association co-sponsored a bill last year to make CCW licenses even more difficult to get and undermine a pro-gun lawsuit brought by The Calguns Foundation against former Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca. That bill, AB 1134, allows a county sheriff to force carry license applicants to first apply to their police chief, pay fees, and get denied before applying to the sheriff’s department.

    FALSE: “In addition to the information already required on the card by the CA DOJ, the new CCW identification cards would become more standardized across the state.” (Source.)

    Uhm, no. AB 2510 would allow hundreds of local licensing authorities to deviate from the state standard license and create their own. And under AB 2510, every local license can be different in size, color, shape, construction, process.

    FALSE: “To ensure a smooth transition to this program, officers will be trained to recognize these new identification cards…” (Source.)

    Huh?! Who writes this stuff? There is no training mandate in AB 2510. And there’s no funding for training in AB 2510. Oh, and we’re still 3 decades behind on training tens of thousands of law enforcement officers how to identify California “Assault Weapons” — do you think that cops are going to use their photographic memories to keep up on California CCW license formats?

    FALSE: “A critical aspect of this bill is that counties can opt in and are not mandated to issue these identification cards. By codifying this program as an alternative option to the one already in place, elected officials are creating an opportunity for better cooperation and communication between local law enforcement and the CA DOJ.” (Source.)

    That doesn’t event make a little bit of sense. The law already says that licenses must be uniform. (See “facts,” above.) So, under AB 2510, “counties can opt in and are not mandated” to use the state-standard CCW license. They can just make up their own. (Like they are now, illegally, which is the real reason for AB 2510.

    (Seriously, go read AB 2510. Look for the words “shall” and “may” — decide for yourself.)

    CLOSING THOUGHTS

    If Eric Linder and California sheriffs really wanted a modern carry license….

    Why are sheriffs breaking the law and doing the opposite of that right now?
    Why don’t they draft and support a bill that actually mandates a modern, uniform license type?
    Why can’t sheriffs spend some of the CCW fees they’re already collecting ($100) on a decent plastic ID card printer that can print the same license format everywhere?
    If you want to stand with us and oppose AB 2510 until it’s fixed, please click here. (You can also click-to-call Eric Linder’s office at (916) 319-2060 and sound off on AB 2510.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *